A reflection moderated on the increase of the VAT

One of the characteristics of this blog is that the posts stretch to be very visceral. Direct consequence of writing to blow of bad milk, I believe that it is inevitable. This way, in a moment of horny I can write a post (or many) ranting for the horrible economic policy of Shoemaker and his team. And I do not repent of anything of what I have said, eye, because it is basically what I think.

Nevertheless, all the opinions admit tones, and what in a moment of dazzling looks like to you an absolute horror, a time later when you think it peacefully and exchange opinions with moderate and well informed persons, since equal you do not a little less like already.

Manuel Cáceres, more moderate than I, he has written an entry in his blog commenting on the increase of the VAT, the possible alternatives and his consequences. I keep on twisting the knob when we speak about the topic, but every time it is difficult to me to defend more a different alternative. And sight that fucks me.

Yes, it costs, in agreement: I have no criterion.

Also you can be interested in:

• Economic policy during two evenings
• Elections have and gain them
• Where is the international socialistic one …
• The Government begins behind in the reform of the system of pensions
• Obedience

My blog works again!

But not me visitiéis! This keeps back with toothpicks. A visits peak when posteo, as some time ago, and the blog falls down. And that that four cats read me … So if you want to keep on enjoying my exquisite words and my clear absence of criterion, they are subscribing me for RSS, that whenever you come here you break it to me. And to comment, they put themselves me in Indian line and they are happening one by one.

Also you can be interested in:

• Happy the computer programmers …
• Entry of test in the new servant
• IN-INDÀ-INDAPANDENSIÀ!!
• The most well-read post of 2009
• Farewell 2009, hello 2010

Happy the computer programmers …

… because they support the calmness while I bring in in way chaos - muerte-destrucción.

Since I changed to my own servant, I am having some problemillas with the blog. In fact, it still does not work as it should, the permanent linkage is not user friendly like the ancient ones but they are those that it uses wordpress for defect, any plugins work of rare form and above the servant remains toasted occasionally and he is going to be done puñetas, and above if it does not long to me for too many postear I can pass several days without finding out until someone alerts me for a tweet.

Before the attack of the Russian lolitas he had already suffering some problems and my hosting provider was insisting me periodically so that it should migrate to a top plan. It was clear that earlier, when they were deactivating the service to me me encabronaba, he was sending them mails indignadísima and was threatening to change to another hosting, and at a few hours they were solving the problem to me. Now, since the manager of the new servant is my husband, it remains a little ugly to give bellows because me the blog has fallen down, so the story now is “Fondness, when you could, if that, the weekend, you look at it for yourself that it seems to me that again it does not work”, approximately.

So that, that although to cudgels and hills, I am still alive and wriggling.

Also you can be interested in:

• Internet is like a neighbors' courtyard
• Entry of test in the new servant
• IN-INDÀ-INDAPANDENSIÀ!!
• The people are not interested in the politics
• Why do they call it a Culture when they mean entertainment?

The work of deputies and the plenary meeting of the Congress

One of the classic obsessions of the Spanish press is to complain that the deputies do not work too much. This article is a classic example: photo of the empty average chamber, more or less important debate, and a bitter complaint of the columnist saying that the legislators give not even blow.

The big Egocrata, explaining of simple form the work of the deputies and the role that plays the final voting in the plenary meeting (the debate that goes out for the TV, in a channel that not even the mothers of the politicians see). I sum it up to you in a pair of paragraphs:

To write laws is a complicated, technical and involved thing. To negotiate them is complicated, technically, involved, slowly and heavily. Both things take a quantity of considerable time, with most of the work in hands of the people of the department of the branch (in case of the parliamentary democracies) or the small army of lawyers and advisers of two or three conferees (in the United States). (…)

What we see in the plenary meeting, in the room with the armchairs and 350 benches, is basically ritual, a theater. The Congress, before the cameras, is staging the work that they have written earlier behind the scenes. The politicians tell what they have done and justify (with vote and countervote, speech and reply) why they have decided to do it, but the work (intense and hard, especially when the government is in minority) it comes of behind. To use the empty benches in the Congress like metrics to know if his lordships are working is a cheap demagogy. The deputies, when they are in the plenary meeting, are not working; they are practising of set.

Also you can be interested in:

• The people are not interested in the politics
• Split in the Ideas, brief explanation
• Split in The Ideas
• A little of self-praise: The Avant-garde has given me an award
• An electoral campaign for the current people

Conciliation. Or something like that, it seems to me …

Samanta Hamlet leaves the reportages program 21 days, and Four has opened the process of selection of personnel to replace it. The requisites, as I read in Vaya Tele, are these:

A journalist, man or woman, between 25 and 35 years, which he dares to live through singular and hard experiences and which also, during a time, he resigns to another life that is not the labor one

To fuck with the prostitute crisis!

• Some recommend to us to open a private pension plan to us because they are working to support the public pensions,
• others want that you work without right to unemployment and with a shit contract to reduce the unemployment,
• and these ask you to resign from your life and they still will call it a conciliation …
• If this situation gets longer very much, let's not discard that they recover the slavery to reduce the social conflict.

Also you can be interested in:

• Badly rollito …
• It is not a strike of the transport: it is a secret management unemployment
• The SHIT contract was not a proposal
• This way it leaves of the crisis
• Adolfo Domínguez

Economic policy during two evenings

The economic vice-president, Helen Salgado, has come to recognize now when an obvious evidence was proving for many, this is that to suppress the Tax of the Patrimony was an error attributable in his opinion to that the Government did not foresee the scope of the crisis. Such an interpretation, nevertheless, is quite generous, since if something deduces analysis of the principal fiscal initiatives taken the Executive from his arrival to the power it is that all his tributary politics is a ludicrous chain of errors.

Juan Carlos Escudier: The modesty of Helen Salgado.

The Congress of the Deputies supported today for unanimity the proposal of the PP to approve an exception to the increase of the VAT foreseen for July (it will go on from 16 % to 18 %) for the different workers who intervene in the reforms and rehabilitations of housings (plumbers, electricians, bricklayers, carpenters …) apply to his invoices a VAT of 8 % instead of 18 %. The target is to promote these reforms and with it to recover employment for the sector (construction) more punished by the unemployment.

The measurement has the blessing of all the political forces and even the emulation of all of them for appropriating it. All the spokesmen dispute the parenthood of the idea. All less Uxue Barkos, of Nafarroa Bai, who distrusted that there is going to apply 8 % who is accustomed to work without invoice.

Salomé García: I compromise against the crisis: the PP gains 1-0

And this way, we might continue up to the next elections, in which there is going to vote for us not even the Tato (with motorbike and without contract). I do not have anything more that to add.

Also you can be interested in:

• Elections have and gain them
• The Government begins behind in the reform of the system of pensions
• Obedience
• Shoemaker and the new international economic order
• EPIC FAIL: of a pernicious management of the expectations to the “Lying shoemaker”

A mobilization, but of really

- Grandfather: you where you were when they delayed the retirement age?

- Playing the Farmville in the Facebook, baby. I became a fan of a page who was saying “Shoemaker, up to the 67 your prostitute goes to currar mother”, but nobody us paid attention.

This evening, the trade unions have summoned declarations against the delay of the retirement age up to 67 years. Declarations of those that go beyond the screen of the computer, of that they ask the people to go out to the street and to concentrate on a place: do you remember how were they?

Certainly, that you can continue taking care at home of the cows of the Farmville while you criticize that the trade unions do not do anything, and thinking that for joining a group of Facebook you have already covered your activism quota and that they do not ask you any more for effort. And I cannot avoid to think that to a society of laborers like that it is deserved that they delay the retirement age, not to the 67, but to the 85.

Also you can be interested in:

• Some interesting February linkage 18th to February 26th
• The SHIT contract was not a proposal
• This way it leaves of the crisis
• Adolfo Domínguez
• Davos 2010